Net ITC Exclusion of Input Services and Capital Goods — Rule 89(5) Chemicals

An Indian specialty-chemicals operator running a three-plant benzene-derived intermediates network in Gujarat closes its books for October 2026 with an aggregate electronic credit ledger balance that reflects a structurally rate-mixed input base: Chapter 29 API-grade organics — benzene, nitric acid, sulphuric acid — sit at 5 percent, Chapter 39 packaging and steam cylinders sit at 18 percent, and Chapter 27 boiler fuel sits at 18 percent but is separately blocked from the refund pool by Notification 09/2022. The output — Chapter 29 nitroaromatics and downstream chlorinated intermediates supplied to global agrochemical, pharmaceutical and dye majors — sits at 5 percent under the standing rate schedule. Every tax period the resulting inverted duty structure locks unutilised ITC into the credit ledger. Section 54(3) of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules 2017, as amended prospectively by Notification 14/2022-Central Tax dated 5 July 2022, gives the refund formula. But the amended Rule 89(5) restricts Net ITC in the refund numerator to eligible input goods only — Section 2(60) input services and Section 2(19) capital goods are structurally excluded. This is the arithmetic that separates a commodity-chemistry inversion economics from an R&D-heavy inversion economics, and it is the reason Net ITC exclusion of input services and capital goods under Rule 89(5) deserves its own worked example in the chemicals reconciliation cycle rather than being handled as a footnote to the parent refund guide.

Quick reference

The reconciliation in one paragraph

A specialty-chemicals operator producing Chapter 29 organic-chemistry intermediates sells its output at 5 percent GST under the standing rate schedule. Its input base is structurally rate-mixed — API-grade organics at 5 percent, packaging and steam cylinders at 18 percent, and boiler fuel at 18 percent that is blocked from the refund pool by Notification 09/2022 — and every tax period the resulting inversion locks unutilised ITC into the electronic credit ledger. Section 54(3) of the CGST Act 2017 permits a refund of that unutilised credit; Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules 2017, as amended prospectively by Notification 14/2022-Central Tax dated 5 July 2022, gives the formula. Two exclusion layers narrow the refund pool. First, per the Notification 14/2022 amendment, Section 2(60) input services (R&D consultancy under SAC 998341, MoEFCC environmental-impact-assessment consultancy under SAC 998311, freight services under SAC 996791, REACH Only Representative retainer, IT and software subscription under SAC 998313, statutory audit fees under SAC 998222) and Section 2(19) capital goods (imported new-plant equipment, tools, spares capitalised under Ind AS 16) are both stripped from the Net ITC numerator — a position the Supreme Court had already confirmed in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps and that the amendment now codifies. Second, Notification 09/2022 separately strips the Chapter 27 boiler-fuel leg. The residual after both exclusions is the refund-eligible Net ITC, and for the R&D-heavy specialty-chemicals persona this article walks the recurring annual leakage from the two exclusions runs to approximately Rs 27 to 28 crore — a permanent drag that commodity-chemistry operations at similar output turnover do not feel in the same proportion.

What the scenario looks like in India — safe illustrative brand persona

The Indian specialty-chemicals sub-segment is dense in the South Gujarat corridor. The Vapi, Ankleshwar and Panoli GIDC estates concentrate the largest share of Chapter 29 organic-chemistry capacity, driven by proximity to the Dahej Petroleum Chemicals and Petrochemical Investment Region and the port logistics at Kandla and Hazira. Jhagadia GIDC and Sarigam GIDC extend the same corridor upstream. Nandesari and Panoli anchor Vadodara-region capacity. Maharashtra’s Tarapur, Roha and Mahad extend the belt southward with a heavier bulk-drug-intermediate profile. Tamil Nadu SIPCOT clusters at Cuddalore and Panruti carry a lighter chemical footprint. Andhra Pradesh’s Vishakhapatnam and Nakkapalli anchor the downstream petrochemical belt, and Hyderabad’s Patancheru, Bollaram and Jeedimetla anchor the bulk-drug adjacency.

Indian listed specialty-chemicals operators running multi-plant Chapter 29 output at the scale relevant to this reconciliation include Aarti Industries (Mumbai-headquartered, benzene-derived intermediates concentrated at Jhagadia, Vapi and Kutch), Deepak Nitrite (Vadodara-headquartered, phenol and acetone concentrated at Dahej), SRF Ltd (Gurugram-headquartered, fluorochemicals and refrigerants), Vinati Organics (IBB and ATBS chemistry), PI Industries (Udaipur-headquartered, agrochemical CSM), Navin Fluorine International (Surat-headquartered, refrigerants and specialty fluoro), Fine Organic Industries (oleochemical additives), Atul Ltd (Valsad, Lalbhai-group dyes and aromatics), and Anupam Rasayan (life-science specialty). Each operates a multi-plant network under separate state GSTINs and files parallel monthly Rule 89(5) refund claims.

For the reconciliation this article walks through, the reference persona is a Mumbai-headquartered R&D-heavy specialty-chemicals operator running three primary benzene-based intermediates plants — a Jhagadia GIDC site, a Vapi GIDC site, and a Kutch-region site — at an aggregate FY 2026-27 output turnover of the order of Rs 6,500 to 7,000 crore. The persona is characterised by a heavy Section 2(60) input-services base: contract R&D consultancy for new-molecule development, MoEFCC environmental-impact-assessment consultancy for continuous consent-to-operate and consent-to-establish renewal, REACH Only Representative retainer for European Union market access under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, IT and software subscription for laboratory-information-management-system and process-automation platforms, freight services for hazardous-cargo movement under the Hazardous Waste Management Rules 2016, and statutory-audit fees. Alongside the input-services base, the persona runs a continuous capex programme — imported reactor and downstream separation lines, brownfield debottlenecking under Ind AS 16 capitalisation entries — that generates a recurring capital-goods ITC leg. The design objective is a per-plant per-month Rule 89(5) refund workbook that correctly strips both the input-services and capital-goods legs from the Net ITC numerator, discloses the exclusion transparently in the Statement 1A annexure, and holds the excluded ITC in a shadow register so the annual leakage is quantified for the CFO’s working-capital view rather than hidden inside the aggregate ITC pool.

The regulatory overlay — Section 54(3), the Rule 89(5) amendment, and the two exclusion layers

Three anchors govern the exclusion cascade documented in this article, and each operates on a different classification layer.

Section 54(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 permits a registered person to claim refund of unutilised input tax credit accumulated on account of the inverted duty structure. The Supreme Court in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd (2021) 10 SCC 674 upheld the statutory scheme and confirmed that the refund is confined to unutilised credit on inputs — input services and capital goods stand excluded from the Net ITC base. The judgment settled the constitutional-validity question and remains the reference point in every refund-claim scrutiny.

Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules 2017, as amended prospectively by Notification 14/2022-Central Tax dated 5 July 2022, codifies the VKC Footsteps position into the rule itself. Maximum Refund Amount equals (Turnover of inverted-rated supply of goods and services × Net ITC divided by Adjusted Total Turnover) minus (Tax payable on such inverted-rated supply × Net ITC divided by ITC availed on inputs and input services). The amendment tightened two aspects: first, Net ITC in the numerator is expressly restricted to input tax credit availed on inputs — input services and capital goods are stripped out; second, the second-limb ratio in the subtraction term is rebalanced by using the sum of ITC availed on inputs and input services in the denominator, which tightens the maximum refund for taxpayers whose input-services ITC share is a meaningful proportion of the total pool. The amendment applies prospectively — applications filed on or after 5 July 2022 use the amended formula; earlier applications use the pre-amendment version.

The two definitional hinges that determine whether an ITC line feeds the Rule 89(5) Net ITC numerator or is held aside are Section 2(60) and Section 2(19) of the CGST Act 2017. Section 2(60) defines input service as any service used or intended to be used by a supplier in the course or furtherance of business — the categorical classification for every ITC line invoiced under a Service Accounting Code (SAC 99xx). Section 2(19) defines capital goods as goods whose value is capitalised in the books of account — the capitalisation entry under Ind AS 16 for property, plant and equipment is the one-way classification gate, and cross-quarter reclassification back to input-goods ITC is not permitted. Section 2(59) defines input as any goods other than capital goods used in the course or furtherance of business — the residual category after Section 2(19) is applied.

Notification 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 July 2022, effective 18 July 2022, operates on a separate rate-side classification layer. It invokes clause (ii) of the first proviso to Section 54(3) and blocks Section 54(3) refund for supplies falling under HSN Chapter 15 (animal or vegetable fats and edible oils) or HSN Chapter 27 (mineral fuels, mineral oils and products of distillation). For a Chapter 29 organic-chemicals operator, the direct footprint sits on the input side — the boiler-fuel leg under Chapter 27 that heats the reactors and provides the steam feed is separately blocked from the eligible-input Net ITC base by this notification, layered on top of the Rule 89(5) input-services and capital-goods exclusion. Sequencing matters in the workbook: first strip input services and capital goods per Rule 89(5) as amended by Notification 14/2022, then strip the Chapter 27 leg per Notification 09/2022, then apply the refund formula against the residual.

A worked example — illustrative benzene-intermediates monthly view

Illustrative — the following figures represent the operating pattern of an R&D-heavy Indian listed specialty-chemicals operator running a three-plant benzene-based intermediates network at the scale that Aarti Industries, Deepak Nitrite and Vinati Organics operate. Public disclosures do not reveal per-plant per-month Rule 89(5) exclusion arithmetic in the granularity below; cross-verify against your own plant’s GSTR-2B and Ind AS 16 fixed-asset register extracts before action.

The three-plant network closes October 2026 with the following aggregate monthly input-tax composition, converted to Rs crore for the tax period:

The Net ITC composition for the Rule 89(5) numerator is built by sequential exclusion. Start with the total tax-period ITC in the electronic credit ledger — Rs 3.21 + Rs 1.15 + Rs 1.39 + Rs 0.90 = Rs 6.65 crore for the aggregate three-plant network. Strip the input-services ITC of Rs 1.39 crore per Notification 14/2022. Strip the capital-goods ITC of Rs 0.90 crore per Notification 14/2022. Strip the Chapter 27 boiler-fuel ITC of Rs 1.15 crore per Notification 09/2022. The residual is Rs 3.21 crore — the refund-eligible Net ITC pool for the tax period.

The recurring monthly exclusion attributable to the two Notification 14/2022 layers alone is Rs 1.39 + Rs 0.90 = Rs 2.29 crore. Annualised across twelve tax periods, the aggregate exclusion runs to approximately Rs 27 to 28 crore per year — permanent recurring refund-pool leakage that the R&D-heavy specialty-chemicals persona feels every year, and that a commodity-chemistry operator at similar output turnover but a lighter input-services and capex intensity does not feel in the same proportion. The design implication for the CFO is that the standing working-capital requirement must be sized against the residual Rs 3.21 crore per month refund-eligible base rather than against the theoretical maximum implied by the aggregate Rs 6.65 crore ITC pool. Building the exclusion register as a distinct shadow ledger — with SAC-chapter traceability for the input-services leg and Ind AS 16 capitalisation-line traceability for the capital-goods leg — turns the leakage into a quantified, auditable line that surfaces in the annual treasury review rather than a hidden absorption inside the working-capital variance.

Common reconciliation breakages

Four breakages recur across Indian specialty-chemicals operators running the Rule 89(5) monthly refund cycle post the Notification 14/2022 amendment, and each maps to a specific control failure that a deficiency memo in Form GST RFD-03 will surface.

• Input-services SAC line bleeding into the Net ITC numerator. The most common cause of a partial refund rejection at scrutiny is the inclusion of SAC 998341, 998311, 996791, 998313 or 998222 line items in the Net ITC numerator alongside the goods-input HSN chapters. The exclusion is codified in Notification 14/2022 and settled at the Supreme Court in VKC Footsteps. Operators that treat the entire GSTR-2B ITC pool as Net ITC without separating input-service line items produce an over-stated refund claim that the proper officer rejects. Reconciliation discipline: the input-services register must be extracted from GSTR-2B at source keyed to the SAC 99xx code and held in a distinct accounting bucket, with the Net ITC formula drawing only from the HSN-goods register.

• Capital-goods ITC bleeding into Net ITC via a delayed capitalisation entry. Section 2(19) CGST classifies an ITC line as capital-goods ITC by reference to the capitalisation entry under Ind AS 16. If the ITC is availed in tax period T but the capitalisation entry passes in tax period T+2 (a common delay pattern where the asset is under commissioning), an operator that assumes the ITC feeds Net ITC because it has not yet been capitalised at the tax period end is exposed. The reconciliation discipline is a monthly forward-look at the fixed-asset register — any ITC line pending capitalisation must be flagged and held aside from Net ITC on a precautionary basis, then confirmed as capital-goods ITC once the Ind AS 16 entry passes. Cross-quarter reclassification back to input-goods ITC is not permitted, so the precautionary hold is the safer default.

• Chapter 27 boiler-fuel leg included in the eligible-input register. The Notification 09/2022 block on the Chapter 27 leg operates independently of the Rule 89(5) input-services and capital-goods exclusion and is often missed by operators new to the specialty-chemicals refund cycle. The boiler-fuel and mineral-oil solvent ITC sits alongside the Chapter 29 API-grade organics and Chapter 39 packaging in GSTR-2B as ordinary input-goods ITC, and it is easy to include in Net ITC without the separate Chapter 27 strip. The related Chapter 27 IDS refund bar Notification 09/2022 chemicals walkthrough covers the block mechanic in detail; the Rule 89(5) implication is that the workbook applies the two exclusions sequentially — Notification 14/2022 first, then Notification 09/2022 — and the residual is the refund-eligible Net ITC.

• Aggregate exclusion invisible to the treasury view. The Rule 89(5) workbook that focuses only on the refund-eligible Net ITC pool and files Form GST RFD-01 against the residual is technically compliant, but it obscures the recurring exclusion from the CFO’s view. An operator that never quantifies the Rs 27 to 28 crore per year exclusion as a distinct treasury line finds the aggregate working-capital variance widening every year without a clean attribution — the finance function debates whether the drift is a refund-cycle timing issue, a working-capital-ratio issue, or an operational absorption. The reconciliation discipline is to hold the exclusion in a shadow register with SAC-chapter and Ind AS 16 capitalisation-line traceability, and to report the annual aggregate to the audit committee alongside the refund claim itself. The reconciliation failure mode analysis pillar and the reconciliation playbook for monthly close operations pillar cover the shadow-register discipline as a first-class monthly-close artefact.

How a reconciliation platform handles this

A purpose-built chemicals reconciliation platform ingests the plant-level GSTR-1 outward supply register, the GSTR-2B auto-populated ITC statement, and the plant’s own accounting ledger and fixed-asset register — and produces a per-plant per-tax-period Rule 89(5) workbook that decomposes Net ITC by HSN chapter for the input-goods register, holds the input-services register separated by SAC code, holds the capital-goods register keyed to the Ind AS 16 capitalisation date, strips the Chapter 27 leg per Notification 09/2022 as a distinct sequential step, applies the Notification 14/2022 amended Rule 89(5) formula against the residual, and generates the Statement 1A invoice-level annexure ready for portal submission. Alongside the refund pack, the platform maintains the shadow exclusion register that quantifies the recurring input-services and capital-goods leakage — the Rs 27 to 28 crore per year drag that the R&D-heavy specialty-chemicals persona in this article’s worked example feels — so the treasury view sees the excluded pool as a quantified, auditable line rather than a hidden absorption into the working-capital variance. Match rate improvement of 51 to 88 percent on the plant-level GSTR-2B to accounting ITC reconciliation, combined with an ISO 27001:2022 posture and DPDP Act 2023 aligned data handling, is what makes the platform an infrastructure investment for an Indian specialty-chemicals operator running a multi-plant Chapter 29 network rather than a spreadsheet substitute.

Cross-cluster bridges and where to read next

The specialty-chemicals Rule 89(5) refund cycle documented in this article sits alongside the Notification 14/2022 Rule 89(5) formula amendment for chemicals walkthrough that reads the formula amendment from the amendment-history angle, and the Rule 89(5) inverted duty refund for specialty chemicals India cornerstone that carries the parent refund cycle end-to-end. The Chapter 27 boiler-fuel and mineral-oil solvent block is documented in the Chapter 27 IDS refund bar Notification 09/2022 chemicals walkthrough. The Rule 89(5) mechanic is common across inverted-duty industries — for the pharma sector, where the same Notification 14/2022 exclusion cascade applies to a Chapter 30 formulator’s input-services and capital-goods legs, the Rule 89(5) inverted duty refund pharma formulations cornerstone walks the parallel monthly cycle. For the edible oil sector, where the direct Notification 09/2022 block sits on the output side under HSN Chapter 15, the edible oil Chapter 15 IDS refund blocked under Notification 09/2022 walkthrough is the cross-cluster anchor.

The methodology framework for building the exclusion shadow register as a first-class monthly-close artefact — with SAC-chapter and Ind AS 16 capitalisation-line traceability, and an annual aggregation to the audit committee — sits in Terra Insight’s reconciliation failure mode analysis pillar and the reconciliation playbook for monthly close operations pillar. The human-error surface where SAC-code misclassification of an input service as an input good produces the refund over-statement is catalogued in the human errors detection envelope reference. The commercial pillar for the chemicals sub-cluster is chemical reconciliation software India; the broader authority for the platform is reconciliation software India with the specialised GST reconciliation software surface for the Section 54(3) refund workflow.

The five FAQs below address the operational questions Indian specialty-chemicals indirect-tax leads and plant controllers ask most often when building the standing monthly Rule 89(5) refund cycle against the Notification 14/2022 exclusion cascade.

Terra Insight Editorial Team Reconciliation Infrastructure

Content authored by practitioners with experience at Amazon India, Intuit QuickBooks, and the Tata Group. Meet the team →

Published 22 July 2026

Domain expertise

TDS Reconciliation GST Input Credit Platform Settlements NACH Batch Matching Bank Reconciliation Form 26AS Matching ERP Integrations Enterprise Finance Ops

Reviewed by

NK

Navin Krishnan

Managing Director & Founder — Terra Insight

Ex Amazon India · Intuit QuickBooks · Tata nexarc

ISO 27001:2022 Patent Pending Incorporated 2024