Skip to main content
How-To · 5 min read

Intercompany Reconciliation in India: Group Finance Complexity

Intercompany reconciliation in India is harder than in most markets because every transaction between group entities carries additional tax complexity: GST must be charged even on intercompany supplies, TDS applies to professional fees and contractor payments between related parties, and transfer pricing documentation must reconcile with the actual transaction amounts. This guide covers all three dimensions.

Terra Insight
Terra Insight Reconciliation Infrastructure

Content authored by practitioners with experience at Amazon India, Intuit QuickBooks, and the Tata Group. Meet the team →

Published 18 March 2026
Domain expertise
TDS Reconciliation GST Input Credit Platform Settlements NACH Batch Matching Bank Reconciliation Form 26AS Matching ERP Integrations Enterprise Finance Ops

An Indian conglomerate with 8 subsidiaries processes approximately 240 intercompany transactions per month — management fees, shared services charges, intercompany loans, and technical service fees. Each transaction carries GST implications, TDS obligations, and transfer pricing constraints. At consolidation, all of them must eliminate cleanly.

Most do not — and the reconciliation backlog at consolidation time reflects the errors accumulated across all 8 entities.

What Makes Intercompany Reconciliation Hard

Intercompany reconciliation is harder than third-party reconciliation for three structural reasons:

1. Both sides of the transaction must agree: A third-party receivable is reconciled against the bank credit. An intercompany receivable is reconciled against the counterpart entity’s payable — both of which are controlled by the same group but recorded in separate systems, sometimes with different accounting treatment.

2. Tax treatment is not optional: GST applies to intercompany supplies even without consideration. TDS applies to intercompany payments for services. Both must be recorded correctly in both entities’ books — and they often are not, because the entities treat intercompany transactions as internal and bypass normal compliance procedures.

3. Transfer pricing constraints: The arm’s length price documented in the transfer pricing study may differ from the actual charges. Reconciling the actual transaction amounts to the TP study is a mandatory exercise for groups with intercompany transactions above the threshold.

GST on Intercompany Transactions

The Supply Between Distinct Persons

Under GST, supply between distinct persons (related parties or different GSTINs of the same entity) is taxable even when there is no consideration — or when the consideration is below market value. Rule 28 of the CGST Valuation Rules requires the value to be the open market value.

Common intercompany GST scenarios:

Transaction typeGST treatmentCommon error
Holding company charges subsidiary management feeIGST/CGST+SGST applicableNot charged — treated as internal reallocation
Shared IT infrastructure charged across entitiesGST on cost rechargeRate applied on cost including GST — double taxation
Head office to branch (same legal entity, different GSTIN)Taxable supply under Section 25Not invoiced — treated as internal transfer
Intercompany loan interestExempt if between body corporatesGST charged — creates excess ITC complexity

TDS Between Group Companies

TDS provisions do not have a group company exemption. A parent company paying a subsidiary for professional services must deduct TDS at 10% under Section 194J. A subsidiary paying management fees to the holding company faces the same obligation.

Transfer Pricing and Intercompany Pricing

Transfer pricing reconciliation is a separate exercise that feeds into the intercompany reconciliation. The reconciliation must confirm that:

  1. The actual charges between entities match the documented arm’s length price
  2. Any deviations from the TP study have been documented with a business reason
  3. The aggregate intercompany charges are consistent with the TP study’s total recharge allocation

Deviations discovered at year-end — after all intercompany transactions have been posted — require restatement entries that complicate consolidation.

Elimination Entries for Consolidated Financials

The Cut-Off Problem

The most operationally damaging intercompany reconciliation error is timing difference at cut-off. Company A records a management fee invoice on March 30. Company B records the corresponding expense on April 5 (received the invoice late). At March 31 consolidation, Company A shows a receivable and Company B shows no corresponding payable.

The elimination entry fails. The consolidated balance sheet has a ₹50 lakh intercompany receivable with no offset.

Solution: Agree an intercompany cut-off date by February 28. All intercompany transactions must be invoiced and recorded by both entities before this date. Transactions after February 28 default to the following financial year.

Automating Intercompany Matching

Reconciliation software India that handles intercompany reconciliation stores the intercompany matrix — which entity owes which to which — and matches receivables to payables across entities, flagging timing differences and amount mismatches before they reach consolidation.

GST reconciliation software that handles intercompany GST ensures that GSTR-1 output tax on intercompany supplies in one entity matches the GSTR-2B ITC input in the counterpart entity — preventing ITC gaps on intercompany transactions.

The GST portal publishes the valuation rules for related party transactions and the specific compliance requirements for supply between distinct persons under Section 25.

Primary reference: GST portal — where GST rules on related party transactions and intercompany supply valuation are published.

Frequently Asked Questions

Must GST be charged on intercompany transactions in India?
Yes. Under Section 7(1)(c) of the CGST Act, supply between distinct persons (different GSTINs of the same legal entity or different group companies) is treated as supply even without consideration. The value is determined under Rule 28 of the CGST Valuation Rules — for related parties, the value must be the open market value or the cost-plus margin acceptable under GST rules. Failing to charge GST on intercompany supplies is a common compliance gap in Indian group companies.
Does TDS apply to payments between group companies in India?
Yes. TDS provisions apply to all payments between Indian entities regardless of group relationship. A holding company paying a subsidiary for professional services must deduct TDS under Section 194J at 10%. A subsidiary paying a parent for technical consultancy is similarly liable. Group company status does not exempt any party from TDS obligations — a common misconception that leads to TDS demand notices.
What is intercompany reconciliation in the context of consolidation?
In group consolidation under Ind AS or Companies Act, intercompany transactions must be eliminated — the holding company's receivable from the subsidiary must equal the subsidiary's payable to the holding company. If both sides of the intercompany balance are not identical (due to timing differences, currency, or GST treatment), elimination entries create residual balances in the consolidated statements. Reconciling intercompany balances before consolidation prevents these residuals.
How does transfer pricing documentation affect intercompany reconciliation?
Transfer pricing requires that intercompany transactions are priced at arm's length value. The actual transaction amounts must reconcile with the pricing documented in the transfer pricing study. If actual charges differ from the study rates — due to volume changes, cost center adjustments, or currency movements — the transfer pricing documentation must be updated, and the difference may trigger a transfer pricing adjustment notice from the Income Tax Department.
What is the most common intercompany reconciliation error in Indian group companies?
The most common error is timing differences: Company A records an intercompany sale in March, but Company B records the purchase in April (next financial year). This creates a balance that eliminates in one company's books but not the other's — resulting in a consolidation difference. The solution is an agreed intercompany cut-off date (typically the last working day of February) with both sides recording transactions by the same date for FY close purposes.

See how TransactIG handles reconciliation for your industry

Configuration takes 2–4 weeks. No code development required. ISO 27001:2022 certified.