Skip to main content
How-To · 11 min read

Auto Component Export Incentive Reconciliation: RoDTEP, EPCG, Advance Authorization, SEZ

India exports over $20 billion of auto components a year, riding a complex incentive stack: RoDTEP e-scrips on FOB value, EPCG duty-free capital imports against a 6x export obligation, Advance Authorization duty-free inputs against SION norms, and SEZ/deemed-export zero-rating with IGST refund under Section 16 of the IGST Act. Reconciling scrip realisation, EO fulfilment, SION input-output norms, IGST refunds and FIRC/BRC realisation — plus Section 413 code 1062 TDS on foreign agent commission — is a multi-scheme control no generic ERP closes.

Terra Insight
Terra Insight Reconciliation Infrastructure

Content authored by practitioners with experience at Amazon India, Intuit QuickBooks, and the Tata Group. Meet the team →

Published 23 May 2026
Domain expertise
TDS Reconciliation GST Input Credit Platform Settlements NACH Batch Matching Bank Reconciliation Form 26AS Matching ERP Integrations Enterprise Finance Ops
Knowledge Card
Problem

Auto component exporters run a multi-scheme incentive stack — RoDTEP e-scrips on FOB value by HS code, EPCG duty-free capital imports against a 6x export obligation over six years with block-wise milestones, Advance Authorization duty-free inputs governed by SION input-output norms, and SEZ/deemed-export zero-rating with IGST or ITC refund under Section 16 of the IGST Act — each with its own realisation, fulfilment and refund reconciliation, layered over FIRC/BRC export-proceeds realisation and Section 413 code 1062 TDS on foreign agent commission, which no generic ERP reconciles together.

How It's Resolved

Tag every shipping bill to its scheme (RoDTEP / EPCG / Advance Authorization / SEZ-LUT); reconcile RoDTEP entitlement claimed to e-scrip credited to scrip realised; track EPCG export obligation as fulfilled-versus-required at total, block-wise and average-EO levels per authorisation; prove Advance Authorization input consumption within SION ratio per authorisation; tie zero-rated SEZ/EOU supplies to the IGST/ITC refund claimed and sanctioned under Section 16 IGST Act; reconcile export proceeds to FIRC/BRC; withhold Section 413 code 1062 on chargeable foreign agent commission with Form 15CA/15CB.

Configuration

Shipping-bill-to-scheme tagging; RoDTEP rate table by HS code with per-unit cap; EPCG authorisation register with duty saved, 6x EO, six-year tenure, block milestones and average-EO base; Advance Authorization register with SION norm per product; SEZ/EOU customer master with LUT/bond reference; IGST refund tracker under Section 16 IGST Act; FIRC/BRC realisation calendar; Section 413 code 1062 non-resident withholding with DTAA / TRC / Form 15CA-CB.

Output

A reconciled export-incentive dashboard showing RoDTEP claimed-credited-realised per shipping bill, EPCG EO fulfilled-versus-required at total/block/average levels with shortfall alerts, Advance Authorization SION consumption per authorisation, SEZ/deemed-export IGST-ITC refund claimed-versus-sanctioned, FIRC/BRC realisation status per export, and Section 413 code 1062 withholding on foreign agent commission tied to the remittance and the export realisation.

An auto component exporter in the Chennai cluster ships $8 million of forged and machined parts a year to OEMs and Tier-1s in Europe and North America. The export business looks profitable on the P&L — but the finance head knows the real margin lives in four reconciliations that never quite close: RoDTEP scrips claimed in shipping bills that have not all hit the ledger; an EPCG authorisation with a ₹5 crore export obligation whose running fulfilment nobody can state precisely; Advance Authorization redemptions stalled on a SION mismatch; and IGST refunds on SEZ supplies sitting unclaimed for two quarters. This is auto component export incentive reconciliation India — where the incentive stack, not the invoice, decides whether the export was worth it.

Quick reference

SchemeWhat it grantsRegulatorReconciliation anchor
RoDTEPTransferable e-scrip on FOB value, rate by HS codeDGFT / CBIC (ICEGATE)Claimed vs credited vs realised scrip
EPCGDuty-free capital import vs 6x export obligation / 6 yearsDGFTEO fulfilled vs required (total + block)
Advance AuthorizationDuty-free inputs vs export obligationDGFTSION input-output norm per authorisation
SEZ / EOU supplyZero-rated / deemed export, IGST or ITC refundCBIC (Section 16 IGST Act)Refund claimed vs sanctioned
Foreign agent commissionNon-resident withholdingIncome Tax portalSection 413, payment code 1062

The export-incentive stack in auto components

India exports over $20 billion of auto components annually, and exporters do not compete on the gross export price alone — they compete on how completely they harvest the incentive stack. Four schemes dominate, and a fifth tax line sits on top:

RoDTEP — e-scrip realisation reconciliation

RoDTEP (Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products) remits embedded central, state and local duties and taxes not otherwise refunded, granted as a transferable electronic scrip (e-scrip) credited in the ICEGATE customs ledger. The entitlement is a percentage of FOB value at a rate that varies by HS code — most auto-component HS lines sit in a low single-digit band, subject to a per-unit value cap.

The reconciliation has three legs: the RoDTEP entitlement claimed in each shipping bill (per HS code on FOB), the e-scrip actually credited to the ledger, and the realisation of that scrip — used to pay basic customs duty on the exporter’s own imports, or sold in the scrip market to another importer (the scrip trades at a discount to face value). A persistent gap between claimed and credited scrip — from HS-code misclassification, a missing RoDTEP declaration flag on the shipping bill, or a value-cap clip — is silent margin leakage.

EPCG — export-obligation tracking

The Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme lets the exporter import capital goods — presses, CNC machines, dies, testing rigs — at zero or concessional customs duty, against an export obligation (EO) of six times the duty saved, fulfilled over six years. The reconciliation runs at three levels:

  1. Total EO against duty saved.
  2. Block-wise milestones — commonly 50% of the EO in the first block (four years) and the balance in the next two years.
  3. Average export obligation — maintaining exports at least at the average of the preceding period’s exports of the same product.

Every export shipment is tagged to the EPCG authorisation and counted toward EO. A shortfall at a block boundary triggers proportionate customs duty plus interest and blocks redemption of the authorisation. The running EO-fulfilled-versus-EO-required position — at all three levels — is the central control, and the one most often discovered late, when a block boundary has already passed.

Advance Authorization — SION input-output reconciliation

Advance Authorization permits duty-free import of inputs used in exported products, against an export obligation. The permitted input quantity is governed by Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) — published input-to-output ratios per product (or a self-declared/fixed norm where no SION exists). The reconciliation must prove that the duty-free inputs imported under each authorisation were actually consumed in the exports against which the authorisation was issued, within the SION ratio: input consumed must not exceed the SION-permitted quantity for the exported output. Excess import over SION, or under-export, creates a duty-and-interest liability and blocks redemption. The SION input-output reconciliation per authorisation — steel, fasteners, consumables in versus components out — is the key control.

SEZ and deemed-export zero-rating

A supply to an SEZ unit or developer is a zero-rated supply under the IGST Act; a supply to an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) is a deemed export under the Foreign Trade Policy. For zero-rated supplies the supplier can either (a) export under bond/LUT without paying IGST and claim refund of accumulated input tax credit, or (b) pay IGST and claim refund of the IGST paid — both under Section 16 of the IGST Act read with Section 54 of the CGST Act. The reconciliation ties the zero-rated outward supply (GSTR-1, with the SEZ/EOU GSTIN and LUT/bond reference), the IGST or ITC refund claimed, and the refund sanctioned and credited. The lag between claim and sanction is the working-capital control — large exporters carry crores in unsanctioned refund at any time.

Section 413 code 1062 — foreign agent commission

Where the exporter pays commission to a foreign sales agent or buying house that sources orders abroad, Section 413 of the Income Tax Act 2025, payment code 1062 (which replaced legacy Section 195) governs withholding on the non-resident payment. The exporter must determine chargeability: commission to an agent operating wholly outside India, with no business connection or permanent establishment in India, is frequently not chargeable — subject to the relevant DTAA and a tax-residency certificate — but the no-PE position must be documented (Form 15CA/15CB) rather than assumed. The reconciliation ties the commission booked, the withholding applied (or the documented no-PE/DTAA position), the FIRC/BRC on the underlying export realisation, and the RBI A2 remittance for the commission payout. The mechanics of this withholding are covered in TDS payment code 1062 Section 413 non-resident.

Interactive Tool

Three-way matching for export realisation

See how the shipping bill, the FIRC/BRC realisation and the incentive scrip line up — and where claimed-versus-realised gaps hide.

Open the three-way matching guide →

Worked example — $8M exporter with a ₹5 crore EPCG obligation

A component exporter ships $8 million a year, holds an EPCG authorisation, and claims RoDTEP on every shipment:

  • RoDTEP: at an illustrative ~1.0% of FOB on the relevant HS lines, the $8M (≈ ₹66.4 crore at ₹83/USD) FOB generates roughly ₹66 lakh of e-scrip entitlement for the year. Reconciliation finds ₹61 lakh credited and ₹58 lakh realised — a ₹5 lakh claimed-vs-credited gap (three shipping bills missing the RoDTEP flag) and a further realisation discount on scrips sold in the market. The ₹5 lakh is recoverable by amending the bills.
  • EPCG: duty saved on imported presses was, say, ₹83 lakh, so the total EO is 6× = ₹4.98 crore (≈ a ₹5 crore obligation) over six years. With $8M annual exports tagged to the authorisation, the EO is comfortably on pace at the total level — but the block-wise check shows first-block fulfilment at 47% against a 50% milestone with eight months left, flagging an expedite to avoid proportionate duty plus interest.
  • Advance Authorization: the SION reconciliation on imported alloy steel shows actual consumption at 1.04× the SION-permitted ratio on one product — a 4% excess that must be regularised before redemption.
  • SEZ supplies: ₹6.2 crore of zero-rated supplies to a domestic SEZ Tier-1 generate an accumulated-ITC refund claim of ₹74 lakh under Section 16 of the IGST Act, of which ₹52 lakh is sanctioned and ₹22 lakh is in process — a working-capital line to track.
  • Foreign agent commission: ₹38 lakh paid to an EU buying house, no-PE position documented under the DTAA with a TRC and Form 15CB, so no Section 413 code 1062 withholding — but the documentation file must reconcile to every A2 remittance.

How export incentives fit the wider auto stack

Export-incentive reconciliation is one rail in the automotive component manufacturing reconciliation sub-pillar and the manufacturing pillar guide. Exporters who process inputs through sub-vendors also run the Tier-2 sub-vendor job-work reconciliation under Section 143, and the duty-free inputs under Advance Authorization must thread through that job-work chain consistently. For RoDTEP rates, EPCG and Advance Authorization licensing, SION norms and the Foreign Trade Policy, see the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT).

What automated reconciliation changes

Manual export-incentive reconciliation lives in disconnected spreadsheets — a RoDTEP scrip tracker, an EPCG EO sheet, a SION file, an IGST refund log — so block-wise EO shortfalls and uncredited scrips surface only when redemption stalls or a refund ages out. Purpose-built reconciliation software India tags every shipping bill to its scheme and reconciles RoDTEP claimed-credited-realised, EPCG fulfilled-versus-required at total/block/average levels, SION consumption per authorisation, IGST refund claimed-versus-sanctioned, and FIRC/BRC realisation as structured variance streams. TransactIG carries 24+ industry presets including a configuration for export-incentive and FIRC/BRC realisation matching. Customer outcomes include match-rate improvement from 51% to 88%. Build is two-to-four weeks on AWS Mumbai (ISO 27001:2022). For the underlying realisation match see three-way matching software India.

Primary reference: Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) — for RoDTEP rates and e-scrip rules, EPCG and Advance Authorization licensing, SION input-output norms and export-obligation tracking under the Foreign Trade Policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is RoDTEP and how is the e-scrip reconciled by an auto component exporter?
RoDTEP — Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products — remits embedded central, state and local duties and taxes that are not otherwise refunded, on exported goods. The benefit is granted as a transferable electronic scrip (e-scrip) credited to the exporter's ledger in the ICEGATE customs system, computed as a percentage of FOB value at a rate that varies by HS code (most auto-component HS lines fall in a low single-digit percentage band, subject to a per-unit value cap). Reconciliation ties three things: the RoDTEP entitlement claimed in the shipping bill (per HS code on FOB value), the e-scrip actually credited to the ledger, and the realisation of that scrip — either used to pay basic customs duty on imports or sold to another importer in the scrip market. A gap between claimed and credited scrip is the core RoDTEP control.
How does EPCG export-obligation reconciliation work?
Under the Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme, an exporter imports capital goods — presses, CNC machines, moulds, testing equipment — at zero or concessional customs duty, against an export obligation (EO) equal to six times the duty saved, to be fulfilled over six years. Reconciliation tracks the EO in two layers: the total EO against the duty saved, and the block-wise milestones (typically 50% in the first block of four years and the balance in the next two years), plus an average-export-obligation maintenance requirement based on past exports. Each export shipment is tagged to the EPCG authorisation and counted toward the EO. Shortfall at a block boundary triggers proportionate duty plus interest, so the running EO-fulfilled-versus-EO-required position is the central reconciliation.
What is Advance Authorization and how do SION norms enter the reconciliation?
Advance Authorization lets an exporter import inputs duty-free against an export obligation to use those inputs in exported products. The permitted input quantity is governed by Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) — published input-to-output ratios per product, or, where no SION exists, a self-declared or fixed norm. Reconciliation has to prove that the duty-free inputs imported under each authorisation were actually consumed in the exports against which the authorisation was issued, within the SION ratio — input consumed must not exceed the SION-permitted quantity for the exported output. Excess imports over SION, or under-export against the authorisation, create a duty-and-interest liability and block authorisation redemption. The SION input-output reconciliation per authorisation is the key control.
How are supplies to an SEZ unit or EOU treated, and what refund applies?
A supply of goods to an SEZ unit or developer is a zero-rated supply under the IGST Act, and a supply to an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) is a deemed export under the Foreign Trade Policy. For zero-rated supplies the supplier can either export under bond/LUT without paying IGST and claim refund of accumulated input tax credit, or pay IGST and claim refund of the IGST paid — both routes under Section 16 of the IGST Act read with Section 54 of the CGST Act. Reconciliation ties the zero-rated outward supply (in GSTR-1, with the SEZ/EOU GSTIN and the LUT/bond reference), the IGST or ITC refund claim filed, and the refund actually sanctioned and credited. Refund lag between claim and sanction is the main working-capital control here.
When does Section 413 code 1062 TDS apply to an auto component exporter?
Section 413 of the Income Tax Act 2025, payment code 1062, governs withholding on payments to non-residents — replacing legacy Section 195. For an auto component exporter, this commonly arises on commission paid to a foreign sales agent or buying house that sources orders abroad. The exporter must determine whether the commission is chargeable to tax in India (often it is not, where the agent operates wholly outside India with no business connection or permanent establishment, subject to the relevant DTAA and a tax-residency certificate), and withhold under Section 413 code 1062 where chargeable. The reconciliation ties the foreign agent commission booked, the withholding applied (or the no-PE / DTAA position documented with Form 15CA/15CB), the FIRC/BRC on the underlying export realisation, and the RBI A2 remittance for the commission payout.

See how TransactIG handles reconciliation for your industry

Configuration takes 2–4 weeks. No code development required. ISO 27001:2022 certified.